When all of the Facts for each profile is documented, I can Remove that Fact and run that report again. So, ALL profiles will have this Fact, so when I run the Undocumented Fact Report, I can Filter OUT, all profiles that have this Fact. I use the Undocumented Fact Report on a routine bases (usually daily). My first step is to Marks ALL Profiles with a Fact that I will use to show me that this Profile is NOT Documented. How I do things, manage Filenames, Citations, Place Names (historic and current), Research Log and ToDo Lists. So the theory that the file and linked Ancestry Member Tree would give me good hints.Īs I said earlier, I have created my standards for my file (now files). The one's I have tried, all were accurate, presented no conflicting information (so far). I did a couple of Web Merges, to make sure that I would get the expected results, that is GOOD Hints.
#Family tree maker for mac 2 review archive
I totally use these hints for all of my research, that I can Online, to gather enough information to know what I need to look for, and where, when a visit to a repository / archive it required. The data that I have, Names, Dates, Places AND Relationships are doing what they should be doing, Generating Hints.
Get this file Online to see IF what I have, will generate HINTS from Ancestry? I need to get this file, up to my standards. That is one of the reasons that I had looked at this file some time ago. I should mention, that this line has some stories that I know about, and have a cousin connection, in my Master File, but that cousin connection also happens to be in THIS FILE. Some Dates, some places, many relationships, but no Citations. I, of course, wanted to be able to say yes or no to questions, but be able to provide Source Information.Īfter some dialog, mostly that I didn't have answers to the questions, I thought about what I should do, This database has about 1250 profiles, with some good information. So, what do I do ? I have this very important person asking me questions about folks in this database. This is one reason why I recommend "testing" your back ups. I did have an external drive crash, had recovered it, but still no back up's with Citations. I had opened it several times over the years, but was very disheartened to notice that ALL of my Citations were gone. Many versions of the program ago, but a friend asked me for some information from that file.
I have a Family Tree Maker file that I had researched 10 to 15 years ago. Just like you would on the Back of that photo, in the good old days. The other option, probably an easier solution is to use the Media Description field in the Media Workspace, where you type in the Names by Row. The issue that you did not mention, is How and Where are you going to present or show that picture with 40 people in it. You still need to know who is in that photo. I have a FlipPal, which allows my to scan an image, then make a 2nd scan, and write a number of a name on that image. Not additional photos are in the Media file.
I used that one photo, and selected each of the four children, and made a profile picture for them. I have a photo of my grandmother, and 3 of her siblings, as young children. There may be a limitation as to how many you can do that for, my Max, so far, is 4. (first, please don't use all caps, it's difficult to read - Thank you)Īctually, FTM2019 added a New feature, which I will have to blog about, where you can use ONE Image, and use that one image to be the Person Profile picture in Family Tree Maker. I WOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR ANY HELP YOU CAN OFFER
#Family tree maker for mac 2 review how to
IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT I MAKE A GHOST OR OUTLINE PICTURE THAT I COULD NUMBER THE INDIVIDUALS SO THAT THEY COULD BE IDENTIFIED ON THE LIST, BUT I AM NOT SURE HOW TO DO THIS.
In the blog post, I mention that I mark the Current Place name a PRIVATE, so that it does NOT appear in the Ancestry Member Tree.ĭEAR ALL I HAVE SEVERAL PHOTOS WITH UP TO FIFTY PEOPLE ON THEM AND WOULD LIKE TO IDENTIFY THE PEOPLE IN THEM BY SOME METHOD SO THAT THEY CAN BE EASILY CROSS REFERENCED TO A LIST OF NAMES. I have blogged about Dual Entry of Historical Place Names, where I enter the Historical Place Name AND the current place name, as I rely on the Map feature. Best Practice for Consistent Place Names, use the Place Name Authority, in the Places Workspace, with the Resolve Place Name tool. There IS a Best Practice for Place Names, and like the above, I have blogged about this. For example: I have my father's name entered at least 7 different ways, ALL based on the Records, appropriately cited, where that name came from. In many cases, that will result in very inconsistent Facts. (and look at the original image, if there is one). Do you have a blog / blogs on best practices for entering data so that it is a consistent format ?ĭata Entry, Best Practice: RECORD (enter the data) that is provided by the Record.
0 kommentar(er)
